Thornton I see you are now using roytam1's Basilisk 55 build! Can you clarify the situation regarding add-ons for that version? Firefox versions higher than 52 do not support NPAPI plugins (now called 'classic' or 'legacy' - although there is still an exception for Flash Player). I wonder if users who are fond of certain add-ons might be better off with a browser based on Firefox 52? FF 55 was not an extended support release, so there have been no updates from Mozilla for at least a year - and yet it is the most recent browser version than any developer has backported to XP and Vista. This roytam1 certainly has quite a few irons in the fire (New Moon 27 and 28, Basilisk 52 and 55, K-Meleon, and even a patched Firefox 45 for non-SSE2 processors) - so many that I think we must be talking about an organization rather than an individual. IMO supporting multiple browsers in a single cumbersome thread is getting Thornton I see you are now using roytam1's Basilisk 55 build! Can you clarify the situation regarding add-ons for that version? Firefox versions higher than 52 do not support NPAPI plugins (now called 'classic' or 'legacy' - although there is still an exception for Flash Player). On the other hand, Moonchild has expressed a determination to retain NPAPI support, and Basilisk 'Moebius' was his project before being 'deprecated.' I note that TechnoRelic recommended a 'legacy extension' for it on page 51 of the 'New Moon' thread, but also mentioned an issue with the extension.

#Pale moon for windows xp old versions keygen#.

Pale moon windows vista